Most projects that fail do not fail because of the code: they fail because nobody agreed which problem was being solved.
Our assessment is not a document of general recommendations. It is an inventory of what you have, a target architecture and a migration plan with order, cost and date.
We work on the real system, not on somebody's description of it. We read the code, look at the database, review the deployments and talk to whoever runs it every day.
Interviews with the business and with whoever operates the system. Access to code and infrastructure. We do not ask for documentation: if it existed, you would not have called us.
Real technical review: code quality, data model, single points of failure, infrastructure cost and bottlenecks measured, not assumed.
Target architecture, phased plan and estimate. Results presented with the open decisions made explicit, so they are taken by whoever should take them.
Most data initiatives die in the pilot. Usually not because of the model, but because nobody settled where the data comes from or who maintains the result.
View →We build systems that other people will maintain. That changes how they get written.
View →An interface is judged by a tired user, in a hurry, with the sun in their eyes. Not on a presentation screen.
View →Initial assessment at no cost. We answer with a concrete scope, with cost and date.